REF FIN · Industries
AI for financial advisory firms
Advisory firms sell judgment but spend the week on preparation: review packets assembled from four systems, reconciliation where only the exceptions matter, and careful answers to routine questions. A meeting-prep agent and a reconciliation checker usually pay first, and both can run inside the compliance perimeter you already govern.
Your advisors sell judgment. They spend their week on prep.
Where the hours go
of prep behind every serious client review, at advisor cost.
Typical for the vertical, not a result from a named client. The audit finds your version of this number.
Meeting prep
01Two to three hours of packet assembly behind every serious client review, pulled from the custodian, the planning software, the CRM, and someone’s notes.
Reconciliation
02Checks where ninety-five percent of the rows are fine and the work is finding the five percent that are not.
Routine client questions
03Careful, compliance-aware answers to questions the firm has answered many times before.
Compliance documentation
04Recording what was discussed, what was recommended, and why, in a form that survives an audit.
What we’d build first
The three builds that usually pay first.
Meeting-prep agent
Assembles the review packet from the systems you already use, drafts the talking points, and flags what changed since the last meeting, so the advisor arrives ready instead of assembling.
Reconciliation checker
Reads the positions and flags only the exceptions, with the reason attached, instead of asking a person to scan every line.
Documentation assistant
Turns meeting notes into the compliance record in the format your firm already uses, for a person to review and file.
Which of these is right depends on your systems and your volume, which is what the free audit is for. If the honest answer is that none of them clear the bar yet, we’ll tell you that instead.
Other industries we know well
Common questions
Financial advisory: common questions
Vet us the way you vet a custodian or any other vendor: due diligence, a written agreement, and least-privilege access. We work inside the compliance perimeter you already govern rather than asking you to create a new one, and we will put in writing what data each system touches and where it goes.
Not by default, and for most advisory work the answer is no. Part of the audit is drawing that line explicitly: what can use a commercial model with a no-training agreement, what needs to run inside your own environment, and what should never leave the building. Firms get in trouble when nobody has drawn that line and staff improvise.
It is common and worth knowing about. Part of what the audit surfaces is where AI is already being used off-book, because that is usually a bigger compliance exposure than anything we would build. The fix is usually a sanctioned tool that is easier to use than the unsanctioned one, plus a clear rule.
Find where AI pays in your business.
The audit is free and the roadmap is yours to keep, whether you build it with us or not.
Free · No pitch · A plan you keep